In the volumetric studies of the brain, there are often conflicting results due to the presence of confounding factors such as age and gender, and covariates like brain volume. At times, in comparison with a control group, for example, this large variability is enough to confound any effect due to the pathology. For this reason, data are generally corrected or normalized by empirical methods as found in other fields of brain studies. In this study, we proposed a normalization method based on a theoretical approach. This method, based on a simple geometrical brain model, has been tested by a comparison with the empirical ones in 16 brain regions, considering two samples of subjects: 19 dyslexics and 10 healthy controls. The results show a good and interesting agreement between data and model and give a new basis for the single subject brain volume normalization. In particular, it is possible to show how the amygdala and the whole brain volume should be thought of, as linked by shape and physiological relation due to the ratio between their volumes.
Keywords:
Published on: Jun 15, 2024 Pages: 39-52
Full Text PDF
Full Text HTML
DOI: 10.17352/jnnsd.000062
CrossMark
Publons
Harvard Library HOLLIS
Search IT
Semantic Scholar
Get Citation
Base Search
Scilit
OAI-PMH
ResearchGate
Academic Microsoft
GrowKudos
Universite de Paris
UW Libraries
SJSU King Library
SJSU King Library
NUS Library
McGill
DET KGL BIBLiOTEK
JCU Discovery
Universidad De Lima
WorldCat
VU on WorldCat
PTZ: We're glad you're here. Please click "create a new query" if you are a new visitor to our website and need further information from us.
If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."