Authors:
Kalpajit Dutta and Rakesh Garg*
Department of Onco-Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Dr BRAIRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
Received: 20 June, 2016; Accepted: 27 June, 2016; Published: 29 June, 2016
Dr. Rakesh Garg, MD, DNB, Assistant Professor, Room No. 139, Ist floor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Dr. Brairch, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India, Tel: +91 9810394950; +91 9868398335; E-mail:
Dutta K, Garg R (2016) Role of Duloxetine as Adjuvant in Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain-An Update. J Addict Med Ther Sci 2(1): 010-012. DOI: 10.17352/2455-3484.000014
© 2016 Dutta K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Introduction
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of many anticancer drugs such as platinum compounds, antitubulins (taxanes and vinca alkaloids), bortezomib and thalidomide [1]. CIPN may manifest as sensory symptoms in hands and feet, typically in a “glove and stocking” pattern; pain, numbness, tingling etc; or motor symptoms such as weakness, deficits in the cranial nerve or autonomic neuropathy [2]. Various pharmacological agents have been evaluated for management of CIPN and have been reported to have variable effects. These agents include amitriptyline, nortriptyline, venlafaxine, gabapentin, pregabaline, lamotrigine, gel mixture of baclofen, amitriptyline and ketamine. These agents have shown variable effects for management of CIPN. The studies have observed to have limited success because of insignificant relief in pain and paresthesia or no difference in pain scores with these drugs [3-7] (Table 1).
Need of newer drug for CIPN
Due to the potential harm, limited data available regarding efficacy and increase cost, new drugs are always introduced into clinical research. Duloxetine is mainly prescribed for generalized anxiety disorder and major depression. Duloxetine has recently been reported for its role in management of CIPN.
Mechanism of action: Duloxetine is a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). Reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine (NE) is inhibited by duloxetine in the central nervous system. Duloxetine increases dopamine level specifically in the prefrontal cortex, via the inhibition of NE reuptake pumps (NET) which is believed to mediate reuptake of DA and NE [7]. Inhibition of serotonin metabolism causes a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine activity and an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines; duloxetine may act through this mechanism in its effect on depression [8]. The analgesic properties of duloxetine in the treatment of and central pain syndromes and diabetic neuropathy are believed to be due to sodium ion channel blockade [9].
Adverse effects: Duloxetine has been reported to be a safer drug without any major adverse effect. However, 10% to 20% of patients do report some minor side effects [10]. The published studies report various side effects with the nausea, somnolence, insomnia, dry mouth, headache and dizziness. Sexual dysfunction is often a side effect [11].
Contraindications: Duloxetine should be avoided in patients with hypersensitivity, concomitant use in patients taking MAOIs, triptans etc, and patients with uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma (Table 2).
-
Table 2:
Overview of clinical studies for role of Duloxetine in CIPN.
Discussion
Duloxetine has been approved for the pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), based on the positive results of clinical trials [12-14]. However two recent studies Yang et al. (2011), and Smith et al. (2013), used duloxetine in CIPN and they found significant reduction in pain scores in duloxetine group than the placebo [15,16]. In both the studies they used duloxetine 30 mg per day increasing up to 60mg per day for 4-12 weeks. The side effects documented were very minimal fatigue (7%) insomnia (5%) and nausea (5%). In addition to a decrease in pain, data from the trial also supported that duloxetine decreased numbness and tingling symptoms [15]. Based on the results of this study, the ASCO clinical practice guidelines categorized this drug for use in patients with cancer experiencing CIPN under moderate recommendation, moderate benefit, intermediate strength of evidence and low harm [17,18].
Conclusion
There is great interest in interventions to treat CIPN, as well as to characterize this treatment-related adverse effect. Although treatment and prevention options for CIPN are limited at present, the use of duloxetine for painful CIPN has been recommended at a dose of 30-60 mg per day for 4-12 weeks. However further studies are required to prove its efficacy in clinical practice.
Clinical application of this knowledge for routine clinical practice
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) remains a major issue affecting quality of life in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The drug armamentarium for CIPN management have limited outcome. The newer role of Duloxetine for CIPN is emerging and would prove useful for better neuropathic pain management. Its dose needs to be titrated as per response and the suggested dose is 30-60 mg/day. This needs to be continued for 4-12 weeks for optimal response.
- Cavaletti G, Marmiroli P (2010) Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. Nat Rev Neurol 6: 657-666.
- Miltenburg NC, Boogerd W (2014) Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: a comprehensive survey. Cancer Treat Rev 40: 872-882.
- Rao RD, Michalak JC, Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Soori GS, et al. (2007) Efficacy of gabapentin in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (N00C3). Cancer 110: 2110-2118.
- Rao RD, Flynn PJ, Sloan JA, Wong GY, Novotny P, et al. (2008) Efficacy of lamotrigine in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, N01C3. Cancer 112: 2802-2808.
- Hammack JE, Michalak JC, Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, et al. (2002) Phase III evaluation of nortriptyline for alleviation of symptoms of cis-platinum-induced peripheral neuropathy. Pain 98: 195-203.
- Kautio AL, Haanpaa M, Saarto T, Kalso E (2008) Amitriptyline in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic symptoms. J Pain Symptom Manage 35: 31-39.
- Hershman DL, Lacchetti C, Dworkin RH, Smith EML, Bleeker J, et al. (2014) Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Survivors of Adult Cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 32: 1941-1967.
- De Berardis D, Conti CM, Serroni N, Moschetta FS, Olivieri L, et al. (2010) The effect of newer serotonin-noradrenalin antidepressants on cytokine production: a review of the current literature. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 23: 417–422.
- Wang SY, Calderon J, Kuo Wang G (2010) Block of neuronal Na+ channels by antidepressant duloxetine in a state-dependent manner. Anesthesiology 113: 655–665.
- Barton DL, Wos EJ, Qin R, Mattar BI, Green NB, et al. (2011) A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a topical treatment for chemotherapy-inducedperipheral neuropathy: NCCTG trial N06CA. Support Care Cancer 19: 833-841.
- Dueñas H, Brnabic AJ, Lee A, Montejo AL, Prakash S, et al. (2011) Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction with SSRIs and duloxetine: effectiveness and functional outcomes over a 6-month observational period. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 15: 242–254.
- Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Takeuchi A, Aranishi T, Morita S, et al. (2009) Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire duringtaxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. Support Care Cancer 17:1483-1491.
- Goldstein DJ, Lu Y, Detke MJ, Lee TC, Iyengar S (2005) Duloxetine vs placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain116: 109-118.
- Wernicke JF, Pritchett YL, D'Souza DN, Waninger A, Tran P et al. (2006) a randomized controlled trial of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Neurology 67: 1411-1420.
- Smith EM, Pang H, Cirrincione C, Fleishman S, Paskett ED, et al. (2013) Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 309: 1359-1367.
- Yang YH, Lin JK, Chen WS, Lin TC, Yang SH, et al. (2012) Duloxetine improves oxaliplatin induced neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer: an open-label pilot study. Support Care Cancer 20: 1491-1497.
- Cavaletti G, Frigeni B, Lanzani F, Piatti M, Rota S, et al. (2007) The Total Neuropathy Score as an assessment tool for grading the course of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: comparison with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Scale. J PeriphNerv Syst 12: 210-215.
- Raskin J, Pritchett YL, Wang F, D'Souza DN, Waninger AL, et al. (2005) a double-blind, randomized multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain Med 6: 346-356.
Table 1:
Pharmacological agents for CIPN.
et al. 2002 [5]
mg daily with dose escalation of 25 mg/week up to target
maximum dosage of100 mg during treatment
period
reduction in paresthesia
(49 vs 55 [scale,
0-100] in placebo arm;
P = 0.78)
Dizziness
Constipation
2007 [3]
NRS and ENS: no
difference in NRS or
ENS score at baseline,
6 weeks, or 14 weeks
between groups
differences
in toxicities
between
groups
2008 [4]
then 150 mg twice daily for 2 weeks
NRS and ENS: no difference
in NRS or ENS
score at baseline or 10
weeks between groups
differences
in toxicities
between
groups
2011 [11]
and ketamine gel,1.31 g of compounded
gel containing 10
mg baclofen, 40 mg amitriptyline HCL, and20 mg ketamine twice daily for 4 weeks
subscale mean neuropathy
change from
baseline to 4 weeks:
8.1 vs 3.8 in placebo arm (P = 0.053).
differences
in toxicities
between
groups
et al. 2014 [7]
and tingling score at week 6: no significant reduction in mean score (P = 0.363)
differences
in toxicities
between
groups